Summary: Our work is different when we are supervised than when we are not, but our character and commitment are measured thereby. We can be Matthias, who accepted an assignment he did not seek, with joy; or Joseph Justus, who failed to get that same assignment,

When you can see your supervisor, you work. When you

cannot see him, your work style is likely to slow down. The

difference between those two things is the measure of your

character and your commitment.

When you can see your supervisor, you work diligently. You

work hard; you get the job done. You want to look good in

his eyes, and besides, if you do not do your work well, you

will be reprimanded. When you can see your supervisor,

and he is looking over your shoulder, your work style is

focused and diligent.

But let that supervisor go out of sight, and it things will

change. Once you know the boss is not watching, your work

style will become more relaxed, less focused. When you

know that the one who supervises you is out of sight, you

back off. The difference is the measure of your character

and your commitment.

What happens in a classroom when the teacher leaves?

Chaos! What happens in the office when the boss steps

away from the shop? Party time! We are different when the

supervisor is out of sight.

Some parents know that and have taken to installing video

cameras in their teenagers’ rooms. Balcony dwellers, for a

small fee I’ll tell your parents how bad an idea that is! We

are different when we are being watched than when we are

not being watched. But the difference is the measure of our

character and our commitment.

When I was a boy it was my job to mow the lawn. We lived

in a corner house, with a pretty good-sized lawn. It seemed

like there was a mile of sidewalks to trim. I did pretty well

with pushing the mower, but when it came to hand-clipping a

mile of sidewalks, I balked. I didn’t like to do that. The only

things that kept me going were that my father expected it,

and that when it was finished there would be a nice reward in

the form of a fifty-cent coin. Now I know that to today’s

generation, fifty cents for mowing a whole lawn doesn’t

sound like much. In the 1950’s, however, it wasn’t bad; and

there was something about the heft of the old fifty-cent coin,

which we don’t see much now, that really made it seem like a

great reward. Knowing that I would get that coin and that my

father expected this job to be done was enough to get me

started. But not necessarily enough to keep up me moving

to finish the whole thing – particularly not enough to keep up

me scooting along the sidewalks and working those shears

to trim that crabgrass. I delayed, I dallied, and I dragged; I

stopped to talk with my best friend across the street. I

stopped to laugh at my friend next door, who could do a

Donald Duck impression that would send you into gales of

laughter. I stopped to tie a clover chain. I lingered under the

magnolia tree to enjoy the shade. Anything I could find to do

to keep me from moving on with that trimming, I did. My

father was out of sight, and the fifty-cent reward was not

enough to keep me moving.

But – here was my problem. My father was a postal carrier,

and he had been assigned to carry the very same street on

which we lived. And so, suddenly I would see him come

around the corner, a short block away, plodding along, up

and down the steps, delivering that mail. I knew that in a hot

minute he would be down to our house and would have

something to say about my lawn-mowing work. When I saw

him come around that corner, then I dropped my dalliances

and discarded my delays! I jumped! And those shears

clattered with the crunch of crabgrass.

It made a difference whether my supervisor was out of sight.

When I could see him, I worked hard. When I couldn’t, I was

lazy. It never occurred to me at the time that he was working

without his supervisor in sight. His boss was back at the

post office somewhere. My father was working out of some

other motivation; he had some other commitment. The

difference between him and me was the measure of our

character and our commitment.

At His ascension, Jesus gave a command and then rose out

of sight. How would the disciples do at fulfilling His

commands when they could not see Him at their side?

Frankly, they hadn’t been all that good at it when they could

see Him! So now, what do you think they are going to do

with His assignment, when He is gone? “You will be my

witnesses in Jerusalem, in all Judea and Samaria, and to the

ends of the earth.” That’s a huge assignment. The ends of

the earth! That puts to shame my feeling overwhelmed at a

hundred yards of sidewalk trimming. How will they deal with

this, how diligent will they be, when Jesus is out of sight?

I want to draw your attention to two men who are mentioned

in the first chapter of Acts and are never mentioned again.

We know almost nothing about them. And yet we can draw

some inferences that will teach us what it is to be diligent and

faithful even when Jesus is out of sight. The two men are

Matthias and Joseph Barsabbas, also called Justus.

Matthias who was chosen to be the replacement apostle and

Joseph Justus, who was not.

Just a reminder of the background here. Jesus chose twelve

people to be His disciples. The number twelve was not an

accident. Clearly He chose that number to represent the

twelve tribes of the ancient nation of Israel. He was using

that number to demonstrate that God was reconstituting the

chosen people – that now God was doing a new thing,

creating a new Israel, the church. The number twelve was

important.

But now the band of twelve was one short. Judas Iscariot

had betrayed Jesus and had killed himself. A replacement

was needed. And so, according to the story, two men,

Matthias and Joseph Justus, were proposed; the group

prayed and asked the Lord to show them which He would

have as the replacement apostle. Then they cast lots –

something like drawing straws – and believed that God had

in that way led them to Matthias. That may not be what you

and I would do, perhaps, but it’s what they did. So the lots

fell. Matthias became the new apostle, and Joseph Justus

didn’t.

I

Now, suppose you were Matthias. Imagine yourself in his

shoes. You didn’t ask for this. You didn’t campaign for this.

It wasn’t in your game plan. You were just an ordinary

Christian, plugging along, content to take a back pew and

just to be one of the crowd. And then the lot falls on you!

Someone proposes you for the office of apostle, sort of like

getting a piece of mail from Publisher’s Clearing House.

“You may have already won an apostleship!” And before

Matthias could say a word, they all bowed their heads in

prayer, and zap! They cast their lots and his name came up!

What would you have done? What would your response

have been?

There are two possible responses. There are two ways to

react when the lot falls on you for something you did not

seek. Either you can say, “No way, not me, not going there.

Didn’t want it, didn’t ask for it, won’t do it, look for somebody

else.” Or you can trust the process, you can see God in it,

and you can do your very best to accomplish what they have

asked you to do. Either you can turn it down flat, based on

your own self-centered wishes; or you can take a deep

breath, look for the will of God in the process, and commit to

doing what God wants you to do. The issue is how we

respond to the expectations of the one who is out of sight.

Has anything like that ever happened to you? Some

situation in which someone just turns to you and, out of the

blue, asks you to do something for the Kingdom? Probably

your first instinct was to look for all the reasons why you

didn’t want to do it. Someone called the other day and asked

if I would find housing for a whole family that was coming up

here from Arkansas to be with a relative confined to the

hospital. I must confess that my first instinct was to whine,

“Why me, Lord? Why do I have to do this? With all the

other work that is piling up and all the other needs I am

supposed to address, why does this lot fall on me?” And I

looked for reasons not to do it.

But then I remembered another occasion when someone

called and asked for help. I remembered that not long ago

they called and said, “There is a young lady from Tennessee

who is in serious condition at Washington Hospital Center.

She and her family want some church folks to come and pray

with them. Would you go?” I remembered how some of us

saw God at work in that, and how we went and prayed with

Amanda Satterfield; I remembered how we have kept up that

relationship, and how her church in Maryville is praying for us

and especially for one of ours who was also in serious

condition. I remembered all of that and said, “Lord, how

could I miss it? How could I not see that here is a witness

that I didn’t ask for? But are you giving us another

assignment, a greater assignment? A Jerusalem, Judea,

Samaria, ends of the earth assignment?”

Just because God is out of sight, and just because the

process is peculiar, and just because we don’t want to do it,

that does not mean that we are excused from responding.

Selfishly, we stay away from tasks we didn’t seek and

question responsibilities we didn’t ask for. But our problem

is that we haven’t stopped to consider whether this is God’s

assignment, even though He is out of sight. And what we do

when we do not see Him is the measure of our character and

our commitment. We have to look for God at work, for, just

as my father was likely to come around that corner and see

how my lawn-cutting was coming, so also our Christ will

come again – that is part of the Ascension Day promise – He

will come again, and there will be an accounting. The

measure of our character and our commitment is whether we

do what He assigns us to do, even when we didn’t ask for it,

and even though He is out of sight. Matthias accepted the

apostolic task and gave himself to it when the lot fell on him.

II

But now suppose you were not Matthias. Suppose you were

Joseph Justus. Suppose you really would like to have been

in that apostolic role, and they built you up to think you might

get it. But the lots were cast, they tabulated the votes, they

counted noses – and you came in second. You didn’t get it.

It went to Matthias, and they all crowded around Matthias

and shook his hand and congratulated him and made over

him. But here you are, Joseph Justus, in your lonely corner.

Playing second fiddle. You didn’t get it.

I confess to at least one guilty pleasure. For years, I have

watched at least a portion of the Miss America pageant. In

particular, I have watched the end of the pageant, when the

winners are announced. Do you remember how they do

that? “The third runner-up is ... the second runner-up is ...”.

Now there are only two left standing. One is going to win

and the other isn’t. One is going to walk the walk and wear

the crown and hear that song, and the other isn’t. With a

flourish and a roll of drums, the emcee says, “And the first

runner-up is ...” Well, the one who shrieks and cries and

jumps up and down is not the one whose name is called, but

the one whose name is not yet called, for she knows that

now she is the only one left. She gets the prize, she gets the

attention, she gets the glory; and Miss Runner-Up is

supposed to hug and smile and congratulate, when, inside,

you know she is churning with disappointment. When you

have wanted something, and it does not come, that feels like

rejection. That feels like a slap in the face. When the lot

does not fall on you, you just want to run.

Poor old Joseph Justus. Built up to think he might become

one of the twelve, but now set aside. He is a little like the

cartoon I once saw, of a man in a hospital bed. He has a

visitor. The visitor says, “I have good news and bad news.

The good news is that our club members voted to wish you a

speedy recovery. The bad news is that the vote was five to

four.” Even when the news is good, it feels like rejection.

So what choices, now, did Joseph Justus have? How could

he have responded to this almost victory that seems like a

defeat? Either he could pick up his marbles and go home,

feeling rejected because he didn’t get the glory; or he could

pick up his injured pride and see that the work of God is

bigger than he is, and get to it anyway. Either Joseph could

go sit in a corner and sulk, sit it out on the sidelines, because

he didn’t get the fancy title, the accolades, or the glory. Or

he could see that the God who loves the church has a place

for everyone, and that the task of being His witnesses in

Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria, and the ends of the earth

requires the diligence of every believer and the commitment

of every Christian.

Brothers and sisters, we do not have the luxury of stopping

to nurse hurt feelings or to attend to bruised egos. The field

is the world, and there is work for everyone of us to do. We

do not have time to let anger divide us or disappointment

derail us. The task is to be His witnesses. The assignment

is this Jerusalem community, this Judea city, this Samaria of

cultural diversity, this endless world of needs. Some folks

just don’t get to do what they think they want to do. They

can choose to undermine the church with hostility, they can

just plain absent themselves. Or they can see the Lord at

work, even when He is out of sight. The willingness to work

for the God who is out of sight is the measure of our

character and our commitment.

Joseph Justus didn’t get to be an apostle. No lot fell on him.

But the nickname he received – Justus, a just man –

suggests that he got right up from the agony of defeat and

found in serving Christ some other way the thrill of victory.

III

Brothers and sisters, the church of the Lord Jesus Christ is a

sacred thing. It is the entity to which Christ has given the

task of redemptive ministry for all people. God in His

sovereign wisdom has given us the ministry of reconciliation.

There is no one in this church who is not needed. There is

no one in this congregation who has no assignment. All are

needed and all can do Kingdom work. There is a place for

you here. The lot may fall on you, or not; but if you accept

what you are given to do, your joy will be out of sight!

There is a place for you if you are Matthias, who quietly and

in faith does what he is asked to do, even though he never

sought it. But Matthias believes that God will empower him

to do what he is assigned to do, and Matthias becomes a

witness to Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria, and the ends of the

world – a very large task. Bigger than a hundred yards of

grass clippings by far! But not a burden when you are

committed to the one who, though out of sight, will empower

you. Matthias’ joy will be out of sight!

And there is a place for you too, if you are Joseph Justus,

who in faith and with a selfless heart, finds his own

assignment, though it carries with it no title and no rewards,

not even a hefty half dollar! And Joseph Justus too becomes

a witness to Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria, and even the ends

of the world, for, unsung though he may be, he works not for

glory but for the one who, though out of sight now, will come

again and will reward him. Not with fifty-cents, nor even with

pearly gates and golden streets, but with the words, “Well

done, good and faithful servant”. I submit to you that Joseph

Justus’ joy will be out of sight!

For after all, both Matthias and Joseph Justus serve one who

for the sake of the joy that was set before Him endured the

cross, disregarding its shame, and has taken his seat at the

right hand of the throne of God. For the sake of the joy set

before Him – tell me, isn’t that out of sight!?