Summary: Most people need a concept of God that can be embodied in some kind of a mental image. This is why the Bible is filled with what is called anthropomorphism. That is a big word that simply means the picturing of God in the form of a man, and with characteristics of a man.

A young boy afraid of the dark called for his mother to

come upstairs to his bedroom to be with him. She came and

sought to comfort him by telling him God was there with

him, and so he didn't have to be afraid. He was all right for

a while, but then he called her again. When she came up he

offered this proposition: "Why don't you stay up here with

God while I go down stairs with daddy?" The child was

simply expressing the natural desire for a tangible

companion. The philosopher may feel at home with some

abstract concept, but most people are like the child, and

their desire is for something concrete.

Philosophy is concerned about God's nature and will,

but it has never had much appeal to the vast majority of

people. It is abstract and talks about God as the Ground of

being and the Fundamental Force of the Universe. Most

people need a concept of God that can be embodied in some

kind of a mental image. This is why the Bible is filled with

what is called anthropomorphism. That is a big word that

simply means the picturing of God in the form of a man, and

with characteristics of a man. God became a man in Christ,

and Jesus said that when we see him we see the Father, and

so our image of God is very manlike. Our highest revelation

of God is in the man Christ Jesus. In Jesus God is a man.

Even before man knew of God the Son the Father was

described in terms of human characteristics. The reason for

this is obvious, for there is no alternative if man is going to

have any intelligent concept of the nature of God. If

anthropomorphic terms were not used to describe God He

would be so abstract as to be almost meaningless, and He

would certainly not be thought of in a way that would be of

much comfort. God is infinite spirit, and all His attributes

are so infinitely superior to ours that we cannot conceive of

God at all in His essence. Our knowledge of God has to be

on the level of the finite. This means we must be aware that

even our highest concepts of God are fall short of what He

really is. God has had to descend to the level of our finite

minds in order to be known by us at all.

If you want to communicate with a dog you do so with

meat and bones and scratching behind the ears. These are

hardly the highest expressions of man's nature, or of his love,

but these kinds of things alone can be understood by the

dogs intelligence. You would get nowhere in communicating

with a dog by mathematics, art, or a lecture on biology.

These are above the dog's capacity, and so rather than get

no response at all you stoop to the dog's level and speak his

language. This is what God has done with man. He has

revealed himself in man-like ways, and with man-like

characteristics. The result is that many young people form

the concept in their minds of God as an old man of great

wisdom with a long white beard. Mature believer know this

is not so, but as C. S. Lewis has said, it is better that God be

seen this way than as a mere abstraction, which is even more

false to reality. He wrote, "What soul ever perished for

believing that God the Father really has a beard?"

It is essential to think of God in human terms, and it is

harmless as long as recognize them as necessary symbols to

represent God, but not necessarily what He actually is. The

Greeks fell into this danger and had their gods on the same

level with men, and this included all of their limitations and

immoralities as well. Most pagan peoples have done this,

and so they have a very poor concept of God. Any god who

is too man-like is a partaker in man's evils. God rebuked

this in Ps. 50:21, "You thought that I was one like yourself.

But now I rebuke you, and lay the charge before you." We

must use the benefits of anthropomorphism, for the Bible

uses them, but we must also avoid its dangers lest we make

God in man's image. God made man in His image, and so it

is reasonable to assume that God is man-like in many ways.

But we need to avoid any idea that God is like man in his

fallen nature.

God has always been in heaven speaking the words that

formed all or reality, but then we come to Gen. 3:8 and all of

a sudden we see God walking on earth in the garden. He is

now clearly in the image of man. Our very first concept of

God, which we can visualize is of a man walking in the

garden and talking with Adam and Eve. We cannot

conceive of what He was before creation, but here we see

Him as a man. What is of interest is that this is not just

anthropomorphic, but is a literal description of what God

actually did. He made himself in the form of a man and

dwelt with man. Only the literal interpretation fits the total

unity of the Bible. The ultimate goal is that God will again

dwell with man.

It is not stated as such but it could very well be that this

one walking in the garden could have been the second

person of the Godhead. Jesus became a literal man in the

incarnation, but here we see him taking on the form of a

man. In the ultimate paradise that we see in the book of

Revelation we know it will be Jesus who will walk with us in

white, and we shall be like Him when we see Him as He is.

Anthropomorphism is justified because God began his

relationship with man as a man. He chose to reveal himself

in the form of a man at the beginning, and actually became a

man in history.

It is implied that God had walked in the garden before this,

for how could they have known the sound of Him

walking if they had not heard it before? They did not see

Him but heard Him coming, and if they had never seen God

before in the form of a man walking, how could they ever

suspect it would be God making the sounds they heard? The

text implies that God actually dwelt on earth with Adam and

Eve. This means that earth was once the dwelling place of

God, and God had actually been on our world in the form of

man before Christ. It could have been the pre-incarnate

Christ who was here in the form of man. He did not come

into flesh through birth, but merely took on the form of a

man as we see He did on other occasions in the Old

Testament.

We see that the Old Testament works away from an

incarnation of God, which was lost toward and incarnation

of God, which gave hope. It is no wonder that the Old

Testament concept of the ultimate kingdom was earth

centered, for this was the setting of the ideal in the

beginning. Even in the New Testament where the eternal

kingdom is pictured as heavenly, there is still the new earth

as a part of it, and it appears that this small planet will be

forever a place where God will dwell with His people, and

walk in the beauty of paradise.

The picture of God walking in the garden was like Jesus

centuries later walking in Palestine, for He was the only man

on earth who was perfect. Adam and Eve had fallen and so

they felt naked before God and they hid themselves. We see

two frightened shameful people who do not want to be seen

in their nakedness. God's first question to fallen man was,

"Where are you?" God was the great seeker of man, and

Jesus came to seek and to save that which was lost.

Everything about this first picture of God reminds us of

Jesus. God finds them, hears their confusion, judges them,

and then provides them with coverings and the hope of

redemption. This whole account pictures God as Christ-like.

We see God in man's image as the God-Man.