“Let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled, for God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous.” [1]
Listening to contemporary sociologists, one would conclude that marriage is a dying institution. Actually, one need not listen to sociologists to draw such a negative conclusion—the incessant push to redefine marriage is indicative of a serious problem in our world. First, the push was to broaden the concept to permit same-sex marriage. The argument was that if two people loved one another, who were we to doubt their love? The concept of marriage was solely as an expression of the means by which one gratified his/her personal desires. Thus, whether we realised the transformation or not, marriage was redefined.
The natural fallout from this redefinition was as predictable as it was inevitable. If all that was required for marriage was an expression of love, then why couldn’t multiple individuals enter into marriage? And if multiple individuals could enter into marriage, who was to say that children should be kept from marriage? And if children could be permitted to enter into marriage, then why not animals? The concerns that were expressed by Justice Antonin Scalia in Lawrence v. Texas [2] are being realised today, and no moral arguments remain to delay the inevitable. Soon, the western nations will be indistinguishable from Sodom and Gomorrah.
The effort to redefine sexual morality is as old as sin itself. Such danger was apparently looming when the writer of the Letter to Hebrew Christians drafted the missive. As that unknown writer drew his letter to a conclusion, he pointedly addressed the threat in succinct fashion. The inclusion of this warning should not be seen as superfluous; rather, it arises from a constant danger for Christians. His cautionary statement serves as the basis for our study today.
LET MARRIAGE BE HELD IN HONOUR AMONG ALL. If marriage is to be held in honour, we must know what marriage is. In order to know what marriage is, we should ask Him who gave marriage to mankind what His intent was. Thus, we find ourselves directed to the first marriage. When God had completed creating the heavens and the earth, filling the earth with the various animal kinds, He created Adam. We read, “The LORD God formed the man of dust from the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living creature” [GENESIS 2:7].
The acme of God’s creation was man; the man was unique, though it appears that he didn’t realise his uniqueness. God revealed man’s unique character through a fascinating means. The account of that divine revelation is provided in GENESIS 2:18-20. “The LORD God said, ‘It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him.’ Now out of the ground the LORD God had formed every beast of the field and every bird of the heavens and brought them to the man to see what he would call them. And whatever the man called every living creature, that was its name. The man gave names to all livestock and to the birds of the heavens and to every beast of the field. But for Adam there was not found a helper fit for him.”
It seems apparent that when this task of naming all the animals was complete, man realised his uniqueness. As an aside, it is apparent from this account that man did not evolve from an ape; otherwise, Adam would have recognised a bond with the apes when he named them. Adam was made aware of his spiritual and intellectual uniqueness—and his aloneness. God had caused those animals nearest in “kind” to the man—the livestock, the birds of the heavens and all the beast of the field. Moreover, it would seem that Adam was aware that each animal had its mate. Thus, he knew he was alone.
God had stated, “It is not good that the man should be alone,” [GENESIS 2:18]; and the man now knew as well that his state was “not good.” God had pronounced a benediction at completion of each step of the creation process, saying that His work was “good.” [3] Ultimately, the Lord God pronounces His work as “very good” [GENESIS 1:31].
However, there was one aspect of creation that was “not good”; the lack of one who was man’s complement was “not good.” The statement that this deficit was “not good” was more a recognition by Adam than an “Oops!” from the LORD God. One should not imagine that God was suddenly forced to resort to “Plan B,” as though somehow he had forgotten something. Politicians demonstrate the Law of Unintended Consequences whenever they craft legislation without considering the consequences. Thus, we witness the sorry spectacle of Presidents forced to invoke executive action to remedy oversights or to avoid politically unpalatable aspects of signature legislation. However, that was not the case with God; God was creating desire in the man, permitting the man to realise his deficit.
God remedied man’s pitiable condition of aloneness, acting in divine fashion to create one who was uniquely like man and yet was not man. This is the account that is presented in the Word. “The LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and while he slept took one of his ribs and closed up its place with flesh. And the rib that the LORD God had taken from the man he made into a woman and brought her to the man. Then the man said,
‘This at last is bone of my bones
and flesh of my flesh;
she shall be called Woman,
because she was taken out of Man.’”
[GENESIS 2:21-23]
The Hebrew quite emphatically presents Adam as saying, “Wow!” Quite literally, Adam said, “This is the right step!” The thought his exclamation conveys could be summed up by, “Finally!” It demonstrates that Adam was led through God’s instruction to recognise his deficit. The man would not be complete without the woman. This is not to say that singles are somehow incomplete, but it is to acknowledge that marriage has this aspect central to its intent.
God then appends this assessment of the first marriage: “Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh” [GENESIS 2:24]. There is then given this rather enigmatic statement, “The man and his wife were both naked and were not ashamed” [GENESIS 2:25]. It is only apparently disjointed from the remainder of the account. The couple were not ashamed because they were not sinning. Husband and wife are permitted intimacy that others are not permitted, in contradistinction to the playboy morals so prevalent in this day. The man and the woman were at ease with one another, without fear of exploitation; they trusted one another.
As an aside of some considerable significance, why do we talk about sex so much in our culture? Compared to many cultures, we are obsessed with sex. Don’t ask, don’t tell was the standard for all intimate relations until there was an effort to protect one group. Decent people did not talk about their intimate moments. I suggest that decent people still don’t talk to others about their intimate time with their spouse. So, why do we talk about sex so much? Is it not because we recognise that we have no intimacy? Is it not because we think that in being “free” about discussing the most intimate facets of life we will somehow make the moments more intimate? I find that the more we expose our intimacy, the less intimacy we enjoy! Perhaps we should consult the one who made us to discover how to utilise the gifts He entrusted to us.
What we know of marriage from this account is several-fold, and it is significant. First, marriage was given to mankind by God. That this is the case is emphasised by the Master on an occasion when He was queried by the Pharisees. The account of that interrogation is found in the first Gospel. “Pharisees came up to him and tested him by asking, ‘Is it lawful to divorce one’s wife for any cause?’ He answered, ‘Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, “Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh”? So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate’” [MATTHEW 19:3-6].
We also see that marriage is between a man and a woman in union throughout this life. God created one who would be a complement for the man. God spoke within the Godhead, saying, “It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him” [GENESIS 2:18]. A couple of points must be emphasised. God chose to make a woman for the man. Thus, woman is the divine complement for a man. God did not make the woman to function solely as a companion for the man. Though a wife and husband should enjoy one another’s companionship; a dog, or even some other pet, could have met the need for companionship. God presented the man with one who would ensure that his life was complete.
God presented the woman to the man with the knowledge that both the man and woman were sexual beings, created thus by the hand of the LORD God. The LORD did command them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion” [GENESIS 1:28]. It is a command, and a blessing, that would be repeated shortly after the Flood had subsided. We read, “God blessed Noah and his sons and said to them, ‘Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth’” [GENESIS 9:1]. After assuring Noah and his family of God’s requirement to take the life of those who shed the blood of others, the LORD God again gave His blessing, approving of mankind’s sexual nature, “Be fruitful and multiply, increase greatly on the earth and multiply in it” [GENESIS 9:7].
That the union was to be permanent is evident from the divine commentary. “A man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh” [GENESIS 2:24]. This knowledge is ratified by Jesus’ statement on the condition as noted earlier. “What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate” [MATTHEW 19:6]. This accounts for God’s emphatic statement, “I hate divorce” [MALACHI 2:16a, NET BIBLE]. Following from this stern view is God’s cautionary statement to all, “Pay attention to your conscience, and do not be unfaithful” [MALACHI 2:16b, NET BIBLE].
By implication, the text means that marriage excludes all other forms of sexual union. Sex is a powerful force; and it is to be employed only in the context of marriage. Despite modern suggestions to the contrary, no sexual activity is blessed or even condoned excepting the marriage bed. Only between husband and wife is God honoured in sexual expression. This accounts for the command, “Let marriage be held in honour among all” [HEBREWS 13:4].
Two primary ways in which marriage is dishonoured are asceticism and libertinism. Asceticism, or celibacy as it relates to marriage, is the concept that singleness is morally superior to marriage. In the apostolic period, there arose a surprising number of movements promoting celibacy as a desirable condition for Christians. An emphasis on virginity as belonging to a state of Christian perfection was promoted by the Montanist movement, [4] which became extremely popular during the early years of the Faith. The emphasis on celibacy among some religious groups today ultimately grew out of this concept that was recognised as deviant and errant.
Paul had warned against this very thing when he wrote Timothy, “The Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons, through the insincerity of liars whose consciences are seared, who forbid marriage and require abstinence from foods that God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth. For everything created by God is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving, for it is made holy by the word of God and prayer” [1 TIMOTHY 4:1-5]. If God created marriage, then the follower of the Lord will recognise that marriage is good. Therefore, those individuals rejecting marriage in favour of celibacy dishonoured marriage.
Contemporary Christians have less trouble with an emphasis on asceticism today than with libertinism—the concept that marriage is irrelevant, permitting the individual to pursue unbridled sexual fulfilment. Modern culture emphasises gratification of every sexual desire as the summum bonum of existence. Consequently, marriage is dishonoured. Sexual activity outside of marriage dishonours marriage. The transformation of marriage from consisting as one man in union with one woman for life to a union into any of the concepts promoted as equivalent in this day, dishonours marriage.
When professing Christians argue that it injures no one for government to legalise same-sex marriage, they dishonour marriage. When professing Christians approve of or participate in the culture of divorce, they dishonour marriage. When professing Christians tacitly approve of adultery or worse still participate in adultery, they dishonour marriage. Consequently, when we dishonour marriage, we dishonour God who gave us marriage. By this criterion, it is fair to say that contemporary culture dishonours God, inviting His displeasure. That is not a position in which we can long continue to exist as a society.
Reviewing the truths provided in the Word, we discover that there exist four purposes for marriage: companionship [see GENESIS 24:67; ECCLESIASTES 4:12]; sexual enjoyment and procreation [e.g. GENESIS 1:28; GENESIS 9:1, 7; 1 TIMOTHY 5:14]; encouraging self-control [see 1 CORINTHIANS 7:1-7]; and illustrating the loving relationship between Christ and His church [see EPHESIANS 5:22-33]. How different this is from the attitude that appears regnant in modern society. These purposes for marriage are worthy of further, brief consideration.
That companionship is an important facet of marriage is apparent from God’s statement, “It is not good that the man should be alone” [GENESIS 2:18]. The statement anticipates the divine assessment provided by the Wise Man. “Two are better than one, because they have a good reward for their toil. For if they fall, one will lift up his fellow. But woe to him who is alone when he falls and has not another to lift him up! Again, if two lie together, they keep warm, but how can one keep warm alone? And though a man might prevail against one who is alone, two will withstand him—a threefold cord is not quickly broken” [ECCLESIASTES 4:9-12]. Each of us longs for a companion who accepts us as we are and stands with us in the vicissitudes of life.
That marriage is meant to provide for sexual enjoyment and propagation of the race is evident from God’s command for the first couple to “Be fruitful and multiply” [GENESIS 1:28]. Solomon wrote a poetic paean for the joy of marriage.
“Drink water from your own cistern,
flowing water from your own well.
Should your springs be scattered abroad,
streams of water in the streets?
Let them be for yourself alone,
and not for strangers with you.
Let your fountain be blessed,
and rejoice in the wife of your youth,
a lovely deer, a graceful doe.
Let her breasts fill you at all times with delight;
be intoxicated always in her love.”
[PROVERBS 5:15-19]
Marriage should encourage self-control and to ensure that men and women have an outlet for their desires. This is the basis for Paul’s blunt statement recorded in his First Corinthian letter. “Because of the temptation to sexual immorality, each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband” [1 CORINTHIANS 7:2]. Paul continues by cautioning married couples that they must not deprive one another of conjugal rights as such could readily lead to satanic temptation. “Do not deprive one another, except perhaps by agreement for a limited time, that you may devote yourselves to prayer; but then come together again, so that Satan may not tempt you because of your lack of self-control” [1 CORINTHIANS 7:5].
Not enough is said of God’s ideal for the marriage relationship as a reflection of His love for His church. That deficit is on those of us who preach the Word. We do well to recall Paul’s teaching. “Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands.
“Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word, so that he might present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that she might be holy and without blemish. In the same way husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as Christ does the church, because we are members of his body. ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.’ This mystery is profound, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church. However, let each one of you love his wife as himself, and let the wife see that she respects her husband” [EPHESIANS 5:22-33].
When the world observes a Christian couple, they should see a reflection of Christ and His church. Wives are to cultivate a submissive attitude toward their husbands, for such honours marriage. Husbands must learn to love their wives, demonstrating love through an attitude of sacrifice for the sake of their wives. In doing this, husbands honour marriage. Husbands are to avoid becoming tyrannical, showing consideration and understanding of their wives in all things. Both husband and wife are to endeavour to honour the marriage, for the Lord’s sake.
We fall in love, and we fall out of love just as readily; the reason would appear to be that we focus on our own fulfilment rather than focusing on fulfilling our partner. The primary argument for same sex marriage appears to be that anyone should be able to “marry” whomever they love. The emphasis is upon personal satisfaction. It is the identical argument that has been presented for no fault divorce for decades: we should not be required to continue in a “loveless” marriage. In other words, marriage is fabricated on the concept of personal gratification. One recent news item demonstrates this position. The erstwhile husband commented after marriage breakup, “I loved her but our relationship wasn’t working. We had big rows and her family never liked me.” [5]
LET THE MARRIAGE BED BE UNDEFILED. Jeannie C. Riley may have crooned, “How can anything so right be so wrong?” Nevertheless, before God there can be no excuse for defiling the marriage bed. The author is emphatic in stating that marriage is to be held in honour; he is equally emphatic in insisting that the marriage bed must be undefiled. The act of love is to be maintained as pure. The language speaks of an offering presented before God. In effect, the writer speaks of the couple offering their lives as a pure offering made to each other and to God.
This view of marriage was radical when these words were written; and the concept is radical in this day. Pliny the Younger was dispatched by the Emperor Trajan to govern the Province of Bithynia, charged especially to look for charges against the Christians. However, when he wrote back, he spoke of their worship in these terms, “[The Christians] customarily gathered before dawn on a fixed day to sing in alternation a hymn to Christ as if to a god, and they bound themselves by an oath, not in a criminal conspiracy, but to refrain from robbery, theft, or adultery, from breaking their word, from reneging on a deposit.” [6]
Modern people, imbued as they are with the heady elixir of self-gratification consider adultery irrelevant, purity abnormal and sex a right. Thus, we are told that youth cannot control themselves, so we must provide them condoms and instruct them in sexual techniques. We are taught that the dissolution of a marriage is of no consequence, so there should be no guilt at marriage breakup. We are taught that people should expect to have sex on each date—women owe it to the men who expect it.
God is quite serious about purity among His people. Writing in the encyclical we have received as Ephesians, Paul instructs the people of God, “Be imitators of God, as beloved children. And walk in love, as Christ loved us and gave himself up for us, a fragrant offering and sacrifice to God.
“But sexual immorality and all impurity or covetousness must not even be named among you, as is proper among saints. Let there be no filthiness nor foolish talk nor crude joking, which are out of place, but instead let there be thanksgiving. For you may be sure of this, that everyone who is sexually immoral or impure, or who is covetous (that is, an idolater), has no inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God. Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience” [EPHESIANS 5:1-6].
In the first missive to the Corinthians, he warns believers, “Flee from sexual immorality. Every other sin a person commits is outside the body, but the sexually immoral person sins against his own body” [1 CORINTHIANS 6:18].
The Apostle’s words echo those penned by Malachi centuries before Paul served the Lord. “This second thing you do. You cover the LORD’s altar with tears, with weeping and groaning because he no longer regards the offering or accepts it with favor from your hand. But you say, “Why does he not?” Because the LORD was witness between you and the wife of your youth, to whom you have been faithless, though she is your companion and your wife by covenant. Did he not make them one, with a portion of the Spirit in their union? And what was the one God seeking? Godly offspring. So guard yourselves in your spirit, and let none of you be faithless to the wife of your youth. ‘For the man who does not love his wife but divorces her, says the LORD, the God of Israel, covers his garment with violence, says the LORD of hosts. So guard yourselves in your spirit, and do not be faithless’” [MALACHI 2:13-16].
No communion is free of the taint of sexual impurity today. The Anglicans and the United Church actively promote immorality in the pulpit through appointment to holy orders men and women who dishonour marriage and cannot in any sense be said to have kept the marriage bed undefiled. Catholics have struggles with immorality in the priesthood. Immorality among evangelicals is obvious as we read on almost a daily basis of youth leaders, or pastoral staff or other church leaders who are acting in an immoral fashion. No protection against immorality is afforded in being religious; one must be born from above and begin a walk with the One who gave us marriage. If the religious leaders are disqualified to provide moral guidance, what hope is there for society?
I am aware that sexual immorality has been a feature of societies since the world began. Before God sent the Flood, sexual immorality brought down God’s judgement [see GENESIS 6:5]. Surveying the ancient world, Paul saw rampant immorality as a central feature of Roman society [see ROMANS 1:18-32]. Tragically, even among the churches of that ancient day immorality had seeped in, necessitating action [cf. 1 CORINTHIANS 5:1-5; 2 CORINTHIANS 2:3-11]. Even in the Letter to the Church at Thyatira, the Risen Christ exposed sexual wickedness. “To the angel of the church in Thyatira write: ‘The words of the Son of God, who has eyes like a flame of fire, and whose feet are like burnished bronze.
“‘I know your works, your love and faith and service and patient endurance, and that your latter works exceed the first. But I have this against you, that you tolerate that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess and is teaching and seducing my servants to practice sexual immorality and to eat food sacrificed to idols. I gave her time to repent, but she refuses to repent of her sexual immorality. Behold, I will throw her onto a sickbed, and those who commit adultery with her I will throw into great tribulation, unless they repent of her works, and I will strike her children dead. And all the churches will know that I am he who searches mind and heart, and I will give to each of you according to your works. But to the rest of you in Thyatira, who do not hold this teaching, who have not learned what some call the deep things of Satan, to you I say, I do not lay on you any other burden” [REVELATION 2:18-24].
The results of our failure to maintain purity in the marriage relationship is as obvious as it is heartbreaking in contemporary culture: forcible rapes, illegitimate births and rampant venereal disease. Some ethnic groups report that up to 74% of births are to unmarried mothers; the lowest birthrate among any ethnic group is approaching one in four. The children raised under these conditions are being raised in homes without a positive male image and a low view of women. The young men disproportionately become brutes and the young women are trained to trade sex in hope of finding love—both are doomed to disappointment. This is not the time for the churches to censure these women; this is the time for the church to preach the Gospel of Grace, offering shelter and instruction in righteousness!
Again, writing the Corinthians, Paul writes, “To the married I give this charge (not I, but the Lord): the wife should not separate from her husband (but if she does, she should remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband), and the husband should not divorce his wife.
“To the rest I say (I, not the Lord) that if any brother has a wife who is an unbeliever, and she consents to live with him, he should not divorce her. If any woman has a husband who is an unbeliever, and he consents to live with her, she should not divorce him. For the unbelieving husband is made holy because of his wife, and the unbelieving wife is made holy because of her husband. Otherwise your children would be unclean, but as it is, they are holy. But if the unbelieving partner separates, let it be so. In such cases the brother or sister is not enslaved. God has called you to peace. For how do you know, wife, whether you will save your husband? Or how do you know, husband, whether you will save your wife” [1 CORINTHIANS 7:10-16]?
Music presents a very low view of morality and purity. Language becomes increasingly degenerate, the writings of contemporary writers are like the drippings of a broken sewer, the raw filth poured into our homes through television and videos contaminates all it touches and even the games we give our children are defiled with filth and violence. In such times, the presence of Christian couples has a far greater impact than any of us could imagine. The world may not act as though our presence is welcomed, but in Christ we point to that which is better; and we do so through loving one another, though living holy and godly lives and especially through picturing the relationship of righteousness in marriage. Underscore in your mind that we Christians are called to be outrageously pure.
GOD WILL JUDGE THE SEXUALLY IMMORAL AND ADULTEROUS. The call to purity for Christians is not something about which we should ever grow casual; no Christian should trifle with God’s command for purity. God, the Living God, is holy, and He calls His people to holiness. The writer of this missive to Hebrew Christians warns, “God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous” [HEBREWS 13:4]. That warning should give pause to all within this modern licentious, libertine culture. Sexual activity outside of biblical marriage will bring divine judgement. Even those who are outside the Faith must give an accounting to God for their infidelity to spouses and for their immorality. God is quite clear on the awesome, and eternal, consequences of such defiance toward His design.
Earlier, the writer of this letter was guided by the Spirit to warn those to whom he wrote, “See to it that no one fails to obtain the grace of God; that no ‘root of bitterness’ springs up and causes trouble, and by it many become defiled; that no one is sexually immoral or unholy like Esau, who sold his birthright for a single meal. For you know that afterward, when he desired to inherit the blessing, he was rejected, for he found no chance to repent, though he sought it with tears” [HEBREWS 12:15-17]. There is a point of no return for those who think to defy the Lord God.
Writing the saints in Corinth, the Apostle warned, “Flee from sexual immorality. Every other sin a person commits is outside the body, but the sexually immoral person sins against his own body. Or do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, whom you have from God? You are not your own, for you were bought with a price. So glorify God in your body” [1 CORINTHIANS 6:18-20].
In the Ephesian encyclical, Paul has cautioned all who will hear what is written, “You may be sure of this, that everyone who is sexually immoral or impure, or who is covetous (that is, an idolater), has no inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God. Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience” [EPHESIANS 5:5, 6].
Among the Apostle’s earliest missives is his first letter to the Thessalonian believers. In that letter, the Apostle reminds his readers of God’s will. “This is the will of God, your sanctification: that you abstain from sexual immorality; that each one of you know how to control his own body in holiness and honor, not in the passion of lust like the Gentiles who do not know God; that no one transgress and wrong his brother in this matter, because the Lord is an avenger in all these things, as we told you beforehand and solemnly warned you. For God has not called us for impurity, but in holiness” [1 THESSALONIANS 4:3-7].
To be certain, all who stand outside the grace of Christ the Lord are now under judgement. Scripture warns, “Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God” [JOHN 3:18]. Again, the Word of God warns all who are unsaved, all who are lost and undone, “Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life; whoever does not obey the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him” [JOHN 3:36].
Christians who have ignored the will of God, believers who have sinned egregiously as they pursue their own will rather than seeking holiness, must stand before the Judgement Seat of Christ. We who believe are cautioned, “We must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil” [2 CORINTHIANS 5:10]. Reviewing what shall occur on that day, the Apostle has written, “If anyone builds on the foundation with gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, straw—each one’s work will become manifest, for the Day will disclose it, because it will be revealed by fire, and the fire will test what sort of work each one has done. If the work that anyone has built on the foundation survives, he will receive a reward. If anyone’s work is burned up, he will suffer loss, though he himself will be saved, but only as through fire” [1 CORINTHIANS 3:12-15].
Perhaps I have spoken to someone who is conscience stricken. You know that the warnings I have read apply to your life, and you wonder whether you can be forgiven. Perhaps you question whether there is any reason to continue to try to honour God because you believe your past choices have disqualified you from honouring Christ the Lord. The judgements of which the text speaks loom ominously over your life and you are in terror. I point you to the promise of God as delivered through the Apostle of Love. “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness” [1 JOHN 1:9].
David’s great sin was scandalous, deplorable, grievous. Confronted by the Word of God, he sought and found forgiveness. He would write of his sin in words which model what you should say before the Lord God:
“Have mercy on me, O God,
according to your steadfast love;
according to your abundant mercy
blot out my transgressions.
Wash me thoroughly from my iniquity,
and cleanse me from my sin!”
[PSALM 51:1, 2]
To confess before the Master our sin, turning from the evil and seeking forgiveness. It may not be possible to return to the evil you have done, but you can seek His forgiveness. We know the Lord is merciful and gracious [e.g. PSALM 86:15], receiving those who turn again and seek Him. What comfort in the knowledge that the Lord forgives those who ask pardon from Him.
Having confessed his sin, David could say:
“I acknowledged my sin to you,
and I did not cover my iniquity;
I said, ‘I will confess my transgressions to the LORD,’
and you forgave the iniquity of my sin. Selah”
[PSALM 32:5]
And He will forgive you as well if you will but acknowledge your sin and ask His mercy.
What has this message to do with love? More importantly, what has the message to do with the church? When there is no trust, love is destroyed. When trust is present, love can flourish. God seeks what is good for His people and glory for His Name. If we ignore His will, we shall see neither good for our families nor glory for His people.
For the church that fails to hold the standard, now that immorality perverts theology. I have personally known several preachers that became involved in what they imagined were secret affairs. God will not tolerate such activity; He will out the preacher that imagines he can continue in such a condition. However, for a while they kept preaching, dividing truth so that they became practical relativists, their relativism eating away at their belief until they were driven from the pulpit and in time driven from the Faith. They preached as though there was a truth for themselves and another truth for those to whom they preached. These men suffered a loss of spiritual power, their spiritual vigour diminished until they were powerless.
There can be no doubt that such people have discredited the Word and promoted great harm to the church. Only eternity will reveal how many souls have been condemned to eternal damnation through the evil of these church leaders. There can be no estimate of the number of individuals just experiencing the first spiritual stirrings, only to be turned away from pursuing the Faith because of a pastor, a televangelist or a Sunday School teacher who thought purity was unimportant. The sin of immorality—especially sexual immorality—is so lethal to the congregation, that it must be said that it would be better to be dead than to damage the church.
Please hear this final cautionary statement, and choose what honours God. From the Throne of Heaven, the Lord God speaks, saying “It is done! I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end. To the thirsty I will give from the spring of the water of life without payment. The one who conquers will have this heritage, and I will be his God and he will be my son. But as for the cowardly, the faithless, the detestable, as for murderers, the sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars, their portion will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur, which is the second death” [REVELATION 21:6-8].
May God apply the message to each heart. May He impel His holy people to seek after holiness. May He encourage each individual who names the Name of Christ to take to heart the Word that teaches, “Let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled, for God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous” [HEBREWS 13:4]. Amen.
[1]Unless otherwise indicated, all Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publishers, 2001. Used by permission. All rights reserved.
[2] Scalia, J., dissenting, “John Geddes Lawrence and Tyron Garner, Petitioners v. Texas,” June 26, 2003, http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/pdf/02-102P.ZD, accessed 11 January 2013
[3] GENESIS 1:4, 10, 12, 18, 21, 25, 31
[4] Philip Edgcumbe Hughes, A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews: The New International Commentary on the Old and New Testament (Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., Grand Rapids, MI 1977) 566
[5] Breitbart.com, “Woman wishes to undo kidney donation to allegedly cheating husband,” 1/27/2014, http://www.breitbart.com/system/wire/upiUPI-20140127-184731-6190, accessed 28 January 2014
[6] Lawrence J. Johnson, Worship in the Early Church: An Anthology of Historical Sources, Vol. 1 (Liturgical Press, Collegeville, MN 2009) 84
