-
I Pledge Allegiance To A Hiding God
Contributed by Joseph Smith on Jul 7, 2002 (message contributor)
Summary: The recent "under God" court decision is inconsequential. Far better to pledge allegiance to a God who does not need publicity and lip service, but who points us to acts of justice, liberation, and witness.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next
In every age there are those who feel they need to help God
out of hiding. God, it seems, is never without public relations
agents, who want to help Him get His name out. They have
their own reasons – some of them well-intentioned, and
some of them selfish – but the truth is that God does not
really need help getting noticed. Publicity is not His thing;
and, in fact, there are times when it seems God actually
prefers to hide. The prophet said it some twenty-eight
centuries ago, “Truly, you are a God who hides himself.” But
some of us seem to feel we have to bring God out of the
closet.
Some of the people who write about church growth, for
instance, say that no church will succeed unless it is in a
prominent location. If you are not on a main street, you won’t
make it! You have to put your church building in a place that
helps God out of hiding! I guess that is what motivated the
many churches that line Sixteenth Street; a prominent
location that symbolically links to the White House and to the
seat of power. They didn’t want God to hide.
In every age there have are those who feel they need to help
God out of hiding, to get His name in laws and on buildings
and out in the marketplace. In the year 312, Constantine,
after the Battle of the Milvian Bridge, felt that Christ had
helped him win the battle that made him the undisputed ruler
of the entire Roman Empire. And so Constantine made
Christianity the only legal religion. Astonishing – what had
been a persecuted faith only a few years before was now not
only legal, but was the only legal way. Constantine brought
God out of hiding. Constantine put God at the very center of
public life. And when he did so, he ruined Christianity! He
spoiled spirituality! He violated the very essence of what it
means to be a Christian.
Before Constantine, to be a Christian meant that you might
have to hide, you might have to practice your faith in secret,
and you might even lose your life for Christ. But those early
Christians burned with a passion for Christ! They really felt
their faith. They had to pay a price for it, but they felt it
deeply and lived it day by day. That was before Constantine.
After Constantine, to be a Christian meant you were a
Roman, so, ho-hum, you got baptized, you were a church
member, no big deal. There was no danger in serving
Christ, and so there was no challenge either. Constantine
made citizenship and church membership one and the same
thing, and neither was helped. Both were diminished. For
centuries we have paid the price of a weakened church and
a careless faith – just look at the state churches of Europe
today and you will see what I mean. Great cathedrals, empty
of worshipers. Governments which nod to God but callously
ignore God’s ways. It does not do anybody any good to help
God out of hiding. God often prefers to do His work in the
shadows.
The founders of the American nation knew that. Instinctively
they recognized that they did not need to help God with a
publicity campaign. These men understood that when the
state leaves the church alone, both state and church do best.
I take as almost inspired those words of the First
Amendment, which I have memorized as if they were the
very words of Scripture, “Congress shall make no law
respecting the establishment of religion, nor prohibiting the
free exercise thereof.” Church and state should stay clear of
one another.
So here we are on the heels of a decision by the Ninth
Circuit Court of Appeals, to the effect that it is
unconstitutional for children to be forced into saying the
Pledge of Allegiance to the flag because of the clause that
affirms that this nation is “under God”. The court held that it
was unfair and sectarian. Those who wished to defend the
phrase argued – are you ready for this? – that the phrase
has no specific religious content! They said that it should be
allowed because it refers to God in a general way and is not
intended to support any particular faith at all! Did you catch
that – the phrase “under God” has no specific religious
content!
You know, I cannot get bent out of shape over this decision.
I am not worried about it because I know that God and His
purposes are not well-worn words in a carelessly repeated
pledge. I know that God’s sovereignty does not depend on
nebulous lip service. And I know from my Bible that there
are times when God prefers to hide, and that, when He does