-
When Your Theology Bumps Into The Facts Series
Contributed by Jim Butcher on Feb 16, 2021 (message contributor)
Summary: A lengthy story about a man born blind provides a clear picture of what happens when your theology bumps into inconvenient facts. Will you reach for God or cling to your predetermined ideas?
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next
SEEING THE LIGHT: The man was blind but saw by believing and obeying Jesus.
- John 9:1-7.
a. We’ll get more into the confusion in a moment, but the disciples echo the prevailing theology of the time and presume that someone must have sinned for him to be blind.
- vv. 1-2.
- It was a theology that everyone suffering deserved to be suffering. It was direct punishment for someone’s sin. In this case, either the man had someone sinned in utero or his parents’ sin had been passed on to him in utero.
- So in a small sense here, the disciples were “blind” to the truth.
b. Jesus is the light.
- v. 5.
- This clearly sets a dramatic contrast. The man has been living in physical darkness his whole life. Jesus comes to bring physical light into his life.
- This sets the stage for the remainder of the passage, where the contrast will be between living in spiritual darkness and spiritual light.
c. The man sees by believing and obeying Jesus.
- vv. 6-7.
- The blind man believes in Jesus and therefore obeys what Jesus tells him to do.
- The result of believing and obeying Jesus is being able to see! This is true physically for the man and spiritually for everyone.
- Why does Jesus do this miracle in such a peculiar way? We aren’t told specifically, but a couple thoughts. One broad statement is that throughout the gospels Jesus heals in a variety of ways. I think He does that in part so that we would not come to believe that there was a “magical formula” to get a healing from God. God works differently in different situations. There is no standard formula. Secondly, I think Jesus is provoking a confrontation with the Pharisees. Jesus having the man go to the Pool of Siloam and to wash on the Sabbath and for the healing to happen on the Sabbath are both “poking the bull.” Jesus knew He was going to get a reaction.
IT DOESN'T ADD UP: God’s work bumped into their theological dogma.
- John 9:8-16.
a. The first few verses tell us that there was a lot of confusion over this healing.
- vv. 8-12.
- Was this the man born blind? How could he see now? Who had done the miracle? Where is the healer now? There are more questions than answers.
b. The Pharisees, though, are dogmatic over the healing.
- vv. 13-16.
- While many are confused and asking questions, the Pharisees have answers, at least in their own mind.
- There is no doubt to them that the circumstances surrounding the healing made it clear that Jesus was not doing God’s work. It was simple: Jesus did not keep the Sabbath. They had complicated and convoluted rules for what was permissible to do on the Sabbath and Jesus had violated their rules. Therefore, He was not doing God’s work.
- Now, their rules were not the same as God’s laws, but they had lost that distinction long ago. Their motivation was admirable – they added the rules in an effort to better obey God. Unfortunately, it ended up with the opposite effect. It caused them to focus on their rules and lose sight of God.
- This happens today all the time. Churches get into legalism where the focus is on what is acceptable and what’s not according to their rules. Christians consider certain sins to be really bad and others to be excusable based on their own sin tendencies.
- What’s striking here is how God’s work bumps into their theological dogma. God is going to do what He wants to do, regardless of our rules. God will move where He wants to move.
- They have certain lanes that they’re ok with God moving in. He’s not allowed to do things that violate their rules.
- Here is a hard truth that we all struggle with at different points: when a move of God bumps against our theological dogma, it’s our theological dogma that we need to reevaluate. Usually, we have made up our theology in ways that don’t match the revelation of the Scripture. (It is worth noting that sometimes the issue is that the “move of God” really isn’t. We need to consider that possibility.)
- This is hard for us to do. We get comfortable in our ruts. We get defensive when things don’t fit into our predetermined categories. We try to manipulate the facts to get them to fit.
- Usually, though, the first step needs to be a humble conversation with God about whether we’ve created theological dogma that doesn’t match the heart of God.
PLAYING CHICKEN: Many bystanders respond with fear of stepping out.
- John 9:17-23.